Remember When Television Programs Didn’t Have Animated Promos For Other Programs?

When I was a young whippersnapper and could eat at McDonald’s three times a week without a health care proxy, there was a separation between television programs, the commercials that funded the television programs, and the advertisements for upcoming television programs that would attract more sponsors, who would fund more televisions etc.  I could watch an entire episode of Growing Pains without being distracted by a tiny Tony Danza plugging Who’s the Boss in the bottom right-hand corner of the screen, berating Samantha for buying a $300 pair of boots with her modeling money.  I watched shows to be distracted from my life.  I did not need a distraction from the distraction.

The only superfluous animation on television then was the channel with the stock-ticker, and I was subjected to that only on days when school was closed and my grandfather came over to watch me while my parents worked.  I guess he never got the memo that the kids were supposed to choose the show.

But no channel these days leaves the house without distracting animation at the bottom of the screen.  It would be like walking around without pants.  During a show about an elite fighting force that infiltrates terrorist cells by offering discounted driveway sealing, there’s a little bride-to-be trying on a wedding dress in the bottom-right corner.  During a show about how to make zucchini casserole in a coffee cup, there’s a tiny cupcake wearing an even tinier smiley face.  During a sit-com about teenagers mouthing-off to their parents, there is a two-inch promo of a sit-com about teenagers mouthing-off to their parents.

I’m sure that when the networks decided to add the moving miniatures at the bottom of the screen, it was after careful market research that showed the average viewer’s brain could handle this level of multi-tasking.  For to absorb the full meaning of the television program and the promo, the nervous system has some work to do.

In the same amount of time that Derek Jeter has to decide whether to swing at a pitch, the average television viewer has to decide whether the promo is worth the transfer of primary focus from the airing program.  In the time that Derek Jeter has to move his arms, legs, and torso simultaneously to connect the bat squarely with the ball, the average viewer at home has to make note of the name, date, and time of the upcoming show without missing any of the witty dialogue or dramatic irony of the current show in which the viewer has so heavily invested.  That so many millions of people can do this for four to six hours a day without going crazy is a testament to the nobility of the human mind.

I, however, have never been able to do that.  Yes, I am one of those poor souls who was born with a brain incapable of focusing on more than one thing at a time.  I cannot even go through the preliminary decision-making stage without shifting my mono-focus.  If I watch a program, and a tiny video or animated graphic appears at the bottom of the screen, I am compelled to convey my full attention to the promo, whether I am interested or not.

And when the brief interlude is over and I just as automatically return my focus to the program I was watching, the program is not the same as it was.  The show is duller in comparison to the new and shiny show that was being advertised at the bottom of the screen.  Sometimes I even forget what I was watching, and can’t remember until I see a promo for the current show during the airing of the promo-ed show.

And then a commercial comes on and I forget about both shows, and focus only on buying something.

N.B. This is a digitally remastered version of an earlier post on the same topic. MK

Advertisements

14 Comments

Filed under Television and Movies

14 responses to “Remember When Television Programs Didn’t Have Animated Promos For Other Programs?

  1. Gosh, I can remember when cigarette advertising permeated the TV.
    The little animation? Those things are the equivalent of new urinals that have the image of a fly baked into them, so you pee on the fly. You can’t help it, it’s a man-thing. You just gotta pee on the fly in the urinal!
    I know, they put it there so you pay attention and don’t pee on the floor.
    The TV ads, well, I metaphorically pee on them in my mind.
    I just hate the annoying little things. They always seem to cover up some text related to the show I WANT TO SEE.

  2. Oh my gosh, and how many times have those stupid animations covered up something you really needed to see!? Like the several words of text completely lost while you are watching a documentary with foreign language or really bad audio. It makes me want to gauge out my own eyes. Thanks for bringing it up, no one else seems to notice.

    • You’re always welcome I didn’t even think of the subtitles. That would be really annoying. And something could get lost in translation, like reading “lightning” where it was really “lightning bug.”

      • Yeah, it’s happened to me MANY times. There’s just way too much going on at all times in the world these days, and this is a little thing, but it’s one more thing…if you know what I mean.

  3. wanderingseniors

    Those little ads, as well as the station logos, were always getting in the way of watching the show. Trying to read the credits? (Some of us really do that.) Forget it. They’re covered with ads or shrunk so small you can’t read them and pushed to the side. I came up with the best solution… we got rid of the satellite. Now we watch what we want on DVDs or Hulu without being force fed all the extra garbage. The extra $70 a month comes in handy, too, for more day trips or a very nice dinner out. I highly recommend ditching pay tv.

    • And they run the credits like they are trying to go faster than the speed of light. Can you imagine if you were credited on the show, and had your whole family assembled to see your credit? Everyone would have to stand up close to the tv and would have a quarter of a second to catch your name reeling by.
      I already get movies from Redbox and Hulu sounds interesting. But my fear of stopping pay tv would be that I would lose the tv/internet package deal, so that in the end I’d be paying just as much.

  4. I hate it too. I don’t think anyone can pay attention to two things at the same time. They can only pay half attention to each if they’re lucky. But worse than that, what’s on that screen between commercials or other shows, I look upon that as mine, bought and paid for. I feel ripped off. Now I just sound like an old person.

    • No, you sound like a genius. I read an article a few years ago about a study that showed that multitasking is impossible, and that people who say they multitask are just switching from single task to single task and doing none of them properly. But tell that to a multitasker, if you can get their attention.

  5. No no no no no we can’t absorb everything…that’s why we need dumber television shows so we can get points while being effectively advertised to. Viewers pay for advertising too.

  6. Pingback: The Modern Author–A New Breed of Writer for the Digital Age of Publishing « Kristen Lamb's Blog

Please leave a comment - I reply to every one!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s